Comments on: You Can Put Lipstick On A Static HTML Site But It Will Still Not Be A WordPress Site

By: Brian

Brian — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:57:25 +0000

I agree with you, HTML coded sites or blog pages are quickly becoming a thing of the past. It is so much easier to set up and maintain a word press page and also adding extra components is simple, so your site can constantly be changed. There are other options such as Joomla or Moodle, which are also great CMS programs similar to word press and even better in some respects. Some web hosts even offer many of these CMS systems already installed; all you have to do is learn how to use them, which takes very little time and in the end you’ll have more control over your blog.

By: speediezz

speediezz — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:25:23 +0000

totally agree, even if you anew user.. a ton of wordpress templates available in internet. the most interesting is, word aclaim wordpress as best cms in this year. above drupal and joomla..

By: dave@the best article directory

dave@the best article directory — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:23:47 +0000

I have just recently started using wordpress for my mini sites as I used to make them from scratch in Dreamweaver. The reason I switched over is because of the amount of time it takes to make them – way quicker with wordpress, especially if you have some pre-made templates. Thesis is great too.

By: VSO Business Success

VSO Business Success — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:00:40 +0000

Yes, You are quite right.
Wordpress is easy to admin and use. It’s the big advantage of WordPress.
And if we want to see our pictures there – we can make the changes in theme!

By: darren

darren — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:46:48 +0000

Jeff, I totally agree with you and in fact, I do have plans to get my own domain and hosting. And when that happens, wordpress’s definitely my choice of CMS. The scalability is fantastic. The only concern is probably the fact that it can be quite a resource hog.

Anyway, you’ve got a great blog! I’m a new convert

By: U2 Concert

U2 Concert — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:50:46 +0000

Yup, I certainly agree with most of your points and comments. Static sites are a bit out dated nowadays. People demand much more updated information and the best way to go at it is blogs. It is easy to set up and basically few minutes of settings and your done. And changing it is also a snap. WP is the best CMS I've come across so far. It's simply the best

By: iphone

iphone — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:46:30 +0000

@big fish im starting on wp to see if it is as good as they claim – i know i am a bit late but i have been using joomla 2 long and all the paid mods and bad support is getting on my nerves

By: u2 fan

u2 fan — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:48:46 +0000

For company websites I usually use a static frontpage with widgets inside that load the content from wp – and a blog that is in the same design as the frontpage

It makes a lot of sense for me since pages and categories sometimes get in the way of a proper blog in a blog structure for lack of better phrasing.

By: Big Fish Games

Big Fish Games — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:39:03 +0000

Effective information for me.After reading this post I do agree that wordpress is really a great platform so I am going to stop dressing up that static HTML website and I will consider WordPress for my next website. Hope the visitors will come.

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:46:25 +0000

Yes, but…. It all depends on how you’re creating your static html site. If you’re using Dreamweaver, then go with WordPress instead.

But there are other ways to create static websites. Arguably the fastest is to use a text editor to maintain a personal wiki and then to export it to html. Muse and org-mode (the best outliner on the planet) on emacs are two great ways of doing this. Org-mode can even be used to generate static blogs dynamically (i.e., each time you export the blog, an updated tag cloud and archive list is generated).

And then there are wikis, which IMHO are better suited to some of the things that people use blogs and complex CMS platforms for. In other words, a CMS like WordPress is quite “static” compared with a wiki.

Wordpress is a great platform. But let’s not forget that there are lots of ways to create and maintain a website (Drupal, django, any number of wikis).