Comments on: Is WordPress Better Than A Static HTML Site

By: Bolton SEO

Bolton SEO — Sun, 16 May 2010 19:49:58 +0000

I’m a relative newbie with WordPress so I have to say that to work with, I prefer static HTML. I can see the appeal of WordPress though, particularly for regularly updating content.

By: Living in DC

Living in DC — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:10:45 +0000

I think WordPress is better for people who update their blogs constantly, or for those who don’t know a lot of html coding. Personally, I prefer static HTML Sites because I can modify the design easily and I don’t update contantly.

By: rinitis

rinitis — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:31:15 +0000

I think the wordpress is much more better, but it depends a lot on the particular.

By: Jonny@registry winner review

Jonny@registry winner review — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:12:17 +0000

Me too, i prefer wordpress to static HTML. The code in wordpress are better than normal HTML sites for SEO.

By: Web design and SEO

Web design and SEO — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:58:25 +0000

In my opinion WordPress is way better than a static HTML website! I mean, why would someone still build a complete static website when WordPress, or other popular CMS are so well made and easily accessible!

By: Swarovski

Swarovski — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:18:35 +0000

I think the most important thing to decide before any design is undertaken is what exactly the site is going to be used for. If its a basic information site then like you said a site can be contained within the blog itself. If on the other hand the site is more specialised such as an e-commerce site then a number of platforms allow for the integration of a blog into the software. This means that rather than have two skins one for the site and another for the blog, all can be contained from the one design. So the most important thing is planning both the short and long term goal.

By: VIP Talent Connect

VIP Talent Connect — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:27:13 +0000

I think wordpress is by far the best cms. You can create a wonderful site in mins.

By: SEO Manchester

SEO Manchester — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:13:29 +0000

Wordpress is far superior to creating a static site for many reasons as mentioned above, and above all we know that Google preferrs to index blog sites more frequently than sites which are not blogs. The RSS feed by now, Google may be crawling and using such as another contributing factor to their SERPS.

Make no mistake in underestimating the power of wordpress used as a CMS and blogging platform-need I mention the all-in-one-SEO pack and the SEO smartlinks plugin which are worth thier weight in gold for the site.

By: RWH @ Reliable Web Hosting

RWH @ Reliable Web Hosting — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:53:41 +0000

Detailed and comprehensive post.
With static sites, it would be very hard to integrate rss feeds, trackbacks, comments etc… I have always had those major setbacks on my html sites. WordPress makes everything so easy with its incredible source of plugins, user friendly interface, and most of all, you don’t need to have an extensive knowledge on how to hand code your sites. Just pick up a theme and you are all set to go.. If you do know little bit about html and php, it is beneficial but not absolutely necessary. You just need to make yourself familiar with the dashboard and settings, and you are all good… WordPress is simply a blessing when it comes to saving time; and the time you save can be utilized in creating more seo friendly content.

By: Buy backlinks

Buy backlinks — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:00:21 +0000

Wordpress sites are absolutely better than static. Google loves seeing updated sites. Keeping fresh content on your site is just as important as any other part of an SEO strategy.